Downjones đang tèo dần... Nhưng thật lòng muốn mai Downjones tăng để mọi người thẫn thờ ngơ ngác...

Đỏ rồi

You never walk alone. I'll be with you

bo day can kak ji xem dj hehe bo nam thang càmg xem mu da chi sg lit cu ifone deo go dc tv tio dungf di ngu roia kuog

BĂc giỏằ chỏc 'ang thỏôn thỏằ nhỏằf. Chỏc vỏằôa xuỏằ'ng tàu . Thôi chỏằm 'ê
SAM, SSI vô 'ỏằ'i

Four Reasons the Stress Tests On Banks Could Hurt Stocks

Topics:Investment Strategy | Stock Market
Sectors:Banks
Companies:Goldman Sachs Group Inc | Intel Corp | Citigroup Inc | JPMorgan Chase and CoBy: Jeff Cox, CNBC.com | 15 Apr 2009 | 04:23 PM ET Text Size Wall Street''s belief that bank stress-testing would be a non-event for the stock market has changed, and investors may not like the results.

The government''s efforts to analyze whether the nation''s 19 largest banks have enough operating capital to avoid federal cash infusions had been receiving scant attentionâ?"until serious questions began to arise over whether the process was flawed.

Concerns about transparency and whether the government has set the bar high enough to declare that a bank has adequate operating cash have some worried that a market that is perhaps overbought might suffer once test results trickle out.

"Most investors have basically written off the stress test, but it also has the potential to do damage," says Quincy Krosby, chief investment strategist at The Hartford. "They have to be very careful. This is going to require a tremendous amount of tact and diplomacy on the part of the administration."

Investor concerns over the stress tests, the results of which will be released in May, break into four categories:

1. Lack of Transparency

As the results of the test get closer to release, the Wall Street rumor mill has churned into overdrive.

The Obama administration has fed water cooler chatter by vacillating on how much will be disclosed. Initial indications were that the administration wanted the results kept private, for fear that banks that did not grade as well would generate panic among investors and depositors alike.

That''s a position that hasn''t set well with Wall Street, where uncertainty is often met with selling.


RELATED LINKS

Current DateTime: 04:05:48 15 Apr 2009
LinksList Documentid: 30230312
Test Results Coming in May
Keep Stress Tests Private?
Stressing the Stress Tests
Why Ireland Scares Goldman
Kneale: Leave Banks Alone
Treasury Says Bank Lending Declined in February

"It does depend on how transparent they are," says Dave Lutz, managing director of trading at Stifel Nicolaus. "The market hates the unknown more than it hates bad news."

Had the administration been clearer on how the tests were going to be conducted and how the news would be released, that would have soothed some fears that a large and unexpected shoe could be dropped.

The alternative, then, "would have been to lay out the plan and announce it fully so investors knew what they were going to do from the beginning, rather than have the rumor mill generate the plan," Krosby says. "What happens now is it looks as if the administration is reactive rather than proactive."


CNBC.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


2. No One Gets an "F"

At the core of the tests is the notion that none of the banks involved is actually going to "fail" the test per se.

Stronger banks will emerge as winners and will not need federal bailout money, while weaker ones will not be allowed to go under but instead be given more time to raise capital as well as government assistance to do so.

That creates a sort of economic bell curve that has some analysts worried about the future of an industry in which bad businesses are artificially propped up--perhaps at the expense of good ones.

"The administration''s approach seems to be we''re going to have a no-bank-left-behind attitude," says Mike Larson, an analyst with Weiss Research. "The reason there''s so much uncertainty and mistrust in the financial sector is we''re not being forthcoming about who''s strong and who''s weak."

Four Reasons the Stress Tests On Banks Could Hurt Stocks
Topics:Investment Strategy | Stock Market
Sectors:Banks
Companies:Goldman Sachs Group Inc | Intel Corp | Citigroup Inc | JPMorgan Chase and CoBy: Jeff Cox, CNBC.com | 15 Apr 2009 | 04:23 PM ET Text Size Wall Street''s belief that bank stress-testing would be a non-event for the stock market has changed, and investors may not like the results.

The government''s efforts to analyze whether the nation''s 19 largest banks have enough operating capital to avoid federal cash infusions had been receiving scant attentionâ?"until serious questions began to arise over whether the process was flawed.

Concerns about transparency and whether the government has set the bar high enough to declare that a bank has adequate operating cash have some worried that a market that is perhaps overbought might suffer once test results trickle out.

"Most investors have basically written off the stress test, but it also has the potential to do damage," says Quincy Krosby, chief investment strategist at The Hartford. "They have to be very careful. This is going to require a tremendous amount of tact and diplomacy on the part of the administration."

Investor concerns over the stress tests, the results of which will be released in May, break into four categories:

1. Lack of Transparency

As the results of the test get closer to release, the Wall Street rumor mill has churned into overdrive.

The Obama administration has fed water cooler chatter by vacillating on how much will be disclosed. Initial indications were that the administration wanted the results kept private, for fear that banks that did not grade as well would generate panic among investors and depositors alike.

That''s a position that hasn''t set well with Wall Street, where uncertainty is often met with selling.


RELATED LINKS

Current DateTime: 04:05:48 15 Apr 2009
LinksList Documentid: 30230312
Test Results Coming in May
Keep Stress Tests Private?
Stressing the Stress Tests
Why Ireland Scares Goldman
Kneale: Leave Banks Alone
Treasury Says Bank Lending Declined in February

"It does depend on how transparent they are," says Dave Lutz, managing director of trading at Stifel Nicolaus. "The market hates the unknown more than it hates bad news."

Had the administration been clearer on how the tests were going to be conducted and how the news would be released, that would have soothed some fears that a large and unexpected shoe could be dropped.

The alternative, then, "would have been to lay out the plan and announce it fully so investors knew what they were going to do from the beginning, rather than have the rumor mill generate the plan," Krosby says. "What happens now is it looks as if the administration is reactive rather than proactive."


CNBC.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


2. No One Gets an "F"

At the core of the tests is the notion that none of the banks involved is actually going to "fail" the test per se.

Stronger banks will emerge as winners and will not need federal bailout money, while weaker ones will not be allowed to go under but instead be given more time to raise capital as well as government assistance to do so.

That creates a sort of economic bell curve that has some analysts worried about the future of an industry in which bad businesses are artificially propped up--perhaps at the expense of good ones.

"The administration''s approach seems to be we''re going to have a no-bank-left-behind attitude," says Mike Larson, an analyst with Weiss Research. "The reason there''s so much uncertainty and mistrust in the financial sector is we''re not being forthcoming about who''s strong and who''s weak."

Chỉ riêng cho thấy ai ai cũng bám víu vào Downjones là cũng thấy hết vị rồi

Xanh thì hò hét: Người nông dân mua vào đê

Hay nhỉ

DJ chỉ tăng 20% mà VNI lên tới 50% mà vẫn tham

hôm qua mỏƠy chú nhĂt gan xuỏằ'ng tàu hỏt roài, lỏƠy 'Âu ra hàng mà bĂn nỏằa

Hàng tưch tỏằƠ dỏĐn 2 thĂng rỏằ"i chú còn bỏÊo lỏƠy 'Âu ra hàng

NGặỏằi ta mua tỏằô lúc DJ còn trên 6.000 tư, 'ỏây thỏằi bi giỏằ. DJ không thỏằf phĂ hỏn khỏằi mỏằ'c 8.300 và hỏt tin hỏằ- trỏằÊ

Giỏằ DJ xanh là bĂn thôi. Còn có vỏạo gơ nỏằa. 2.000 tỏằ? bĂn ra không mỏĂo hiỏằfm quay lỏĂi múc luôn 'Âu nhâ

Cam ơn bác sáng ra đã súc miệng bài hát của bác roài đấy...nhưng hỏi bác cách đưa bài hát lên đây ntn nhỉ?